Showing posts with label English language. Show all posts
Showing posts with label English language. Show all posts

Thursday, December 2, 2010

Just... don't.

"BRCA status" is not so long and clunky that you should feel the need to say "BRCA-ness", as in "property X is probably related to the BRCA-ness of the cell line".

If you absolutely must say "BRCA-ness", pronounce it "bracka-ness", not "bee are see eh-ness"

Please.

Friday, November 5, 2010

QUIZ: Elementary, my dear readers!

Ooh, this is gonna be a good one!

Remember that this time I've activated comment moderation (for the first time EVAH), and you have 24(ish) hours to submit as many answers as you can before I open up the comments (as soon as I get up tomorrow). Put them all in one comment, or keep coming back and leaving multiple comments - either way is fine!

Once the comments are open, you can keep submitting answers to any outstanding questions on a free-for-all basis. Once all questions are answered OR you've all given up, I'll declare the winner(s)!

Right.

This is another anagram quiz, with a chemical reaction twist. You're given some of the letters from the left hand side of the "equation", but the other letters are from the name of a chemical element. You "react" the letters of that element with the given letters to make a synonym of the clue word (or phrase) on the right hand side of the equation.

For example, for this clue:

Element + given letters = clue word/phrase

_ _ _ _ +          R             = kind of tree

the answer is:

L E A D +       R             = ALDER

You need to provide both the element (e.g. LEAD) and the clue word (e.g. ALDER).

Clear as mud?

Off we go!

1. _ _ _ _ + S P = jail


2. _ _ _ _ + T I E = resident


3. _ _ _ _ _ + C = wild horse


4. _ _ _ _ _ + A L = crunchy cereal


5. _ _ _ _ _ _ + N T = alight


6. _ _ _ _ _ _ + K U = power loss


7. _ _ _ _ _ _ + I S E = submarine spyglass


8. _ _ _ _ _ _ + I L U = stereoscopic


9. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + Y = modesty


10. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + E = augment


11. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + S T = Satan's sulphur


12. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + L O = accident


13. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _  + U = kind of dog


14. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + C = history


15. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + N = postulation

Easy peasy lemon squeezy! Have fun!

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Context is everything

Gotta love the intersection between science / clinical trial acronyms and automated word choice suggestions:


Yes, lots of people eat rye bread in the former colonies, but that's not quite what I was going for.

In other news, I started quite the debate on Twitter today when I asked whether it should be wildtype, wild-type, or wild type. According to a Nature subeditor who replied, wild type is a noun, wild-type is an adjective, and wildtype can be either.

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Days of hours of minutes

A blog buddy (who may or may not wish to identify themselves in the comments) posted a wee ditty on their Facebook page recently that rang very true indeed:
just received something from a fellow sufferer that will only be funny to Secretaries (with a capital 'S'):

"And so while the great ones depart to their dinner,
The Secretary stays, growing thinner and thinner.
Racking his brain to record and report,
What he thinks that they think that they ought to have thought."
The post made me literally laugh out loud. I'm responsible for taking minutes at several recurring meetings - it only takes one instance of "it was decided that the prospect of cruel would be better than the reflex perspective analysis*" to see why someone with a scientific background is needed for this task - and part of the reason for my relative bloggy silence recently is that I was down in San Diego last week at a research collaboration progress meeting, typing away so fast that I'm surprised my laptop keyboard is still intact and functional.

The meetings themselves are hard work, both physically and mentally. I type and type and type almost non-stop for hours on end, battling through the hand, wrist and shoulder pains (laptop keyboards are not designed for such marathon sessions) as I try to capture every single little thing that's said, struggling with the balance between brevity and speed versus future intelligibility. Unlike the other attendees I can't zone out or divert my attention to another task even for a couple of minutes, a lesson I learned the hard way after embarrassingly failing to capture an important action item at one of my first meetings with these collaborators, while I was checking my (work!) email. I even have to keep typing during the coffee and lunch breaks, as people come up to me asking for additions to be made to the minutes following one-on-one conversations they just had with another attendee while getting their coffee.

The most stressful part comes at the end of each day, though, when I'm asked for a list of all the action items generated. This request took me completely by surprise the first time, but luckily I'd decided that it might be useful to have the action items highlighted in red text. Even now though it can be an embarrassing process that can make me look really stupid as I scroll through pages and pages of text** trying to read out the action items in a coherent manner. I'm not sure everyone realises that there's just not enough time in the heat of the moment to type in more than "ACTION: [PI] will get back to [collaborator] with answers to the above questions". This item might refer to a full page of discussion about how to proceed with a project, but makes no sense when read out in a list, separated from its original context.

I also colour code (in blue) any amusing little conversations or observations that pop up that can't go into the actual formal minutes, but that might make good blog fodder. The bloggable LOLs from this meeting include an amusing conversation:
My boss: "Who did this scoring and analysis? This project needs to be led by a human pathologist".

Hilarious collaborator: "Well, he's definitely human..."

a promise to myself:
"I hereby swear to never, ever, use 'homozygose' as a verb" (my boss had just done this, in the context of trying to engineer a cell line homozygous for a gene mutation that we only ever see as a heterozygote in a certain tumour type).

and an observation from me about another lazy bit of technical jargon that, like "poor prognostic marker", doesn't stand up to grammatical scrutiny. This time the example was "spontaneous mouse models", which caused me to have to suppress a snigger as I imagined a bunch of white mice suddenly popping into existence in a lab. Sure, "mouse model of spontaneous tumour development" is more of a mouthful, but at least it's accurate.


Unlike the person in the verse , I do at least get to go to dinner - an excellent Mexican restaurant this last time. Mmmmm, guacomole. A few of us also enjoyed some excellent local beer on a beachfront patio on the second day, as the meeting finished a couple of hours early and we couldn't change our flights home. The chances of me growing thinner and thinner on one of these trips are, well, slim.

The effort continues when I get back to the office and have to prepare formal, neat versions of the notes for circulation to all internal and external collaborators and their bosses. I have to re-order the original minutes to capture follow-up comments and action items that someone suddenly thought of in the middle of a presentation about another project, to make the information flow more logically within and between sections, and to remove some of the more random dead-end tangents completely. I also have to clarify or remove any items that really don't make any sense (I'm usually too busy typing for any critical analysis of what I'm writing), and add some context into all the action items.

I also have to fix all the typos and auto-corrects, turning all the "serious ovation cancers" back into "serous ovarian cancers" and such, and adding all the optional little luxuries that I don't have time for during the actual meetings - luxuries such as full words, sentences, paragraphs, and grammar. You know, the minor details. Once that's done I can format the document, try to proofread it, realise I'm heartily sick of the damn thing and only be able  to bring myself to skim it superficially, send it out, and then spot an embarrassing surviving typo as I go to close the document.


Oh well, at least I remembered to take out my observation about mice spontaneously popping into existence.

An action item about the cakes to be served at the next meeting did make it through, but that was deliberate.

Nope, definitely not gonna get any thinner playing this game.


------------
*Seen in minutes from a meeting that took place before my time, when the admin assistants were responsible for all minutes, including those of very technical meetings. Sentence should read "it was decided that prospective accrual would be better than retrospective analysis". I  think.

**At the actual 1.5 day meeting I typed a total of 30 pages of notes, which translated to 31 pages of nicely formatted formal minutes with each major item starting on a new page. 

Friday, October 1, 2010

Friday Quiz: Missing Links

It's time for another quiz taken from my puzzle of the day desk calendar! I think I'm going to have to buy myself another calendar next year if Santa doesn't bring me one; it's provided some really fun blogging experiences. (Either that or I'm going to have  to make up my own quizzes, which sounds too much like hard work).

This time the aim is to fill in the missing middle word on each line, so that the first two words AND the last two words of each set form a scientific(ish) term. As a non-sciency example, fill in the gap below

GREEN ________ BAG

with the word TEA, to form the terms GREEN TEA and TEA BAG.

As before, answer in the comments in any order you like - but please submit only one answer per person per hour, to give as many people as possible a chance to play!  
  1. DRY __ICE__ AGE (Lisbeth)
  2. STROBE _LIGHT_ WAVE (Pika)
  3. BINARY __STAR__ FISH (Alyssa)
  4. FOOD _CHAIN_ REACTION (Bob)
  5. HEAVY _WATER_ TABLE (Anonymous)
  6. PERPETUAL _MOTION_ SICKNESS (Mermaid)
  7. CLEAN __ROOM__ TEMPERATURE (Chall)
  8. FUEL __CELL__ DIVISION (Schlupp)
  9. COMMON __COLD__ FUSION (Pika)
  10. LAND __MASS__ SPECTROMETER (Alyssa)

I got all but one of the answers. Let's just say that I came up with some fairly ridiculous guesses (binary cat? Code fish?) out of desperation, and felt rather silly when I saw the answer!

I'll update the post with the answers and bragging rights as and when I get time, and I'll add clues if there are any unanswered questions after a day or two.

Have fun!

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Hankie enlightenment

I found an absolute gem in my automated search results this morning: a bio of a man I know fairly well, having worked for two of the organisations named in the piece. However, it turns out that I didn't know him anywhere near as well as I thought I did. I never knew, for example, that this man "as good as graduated with a BSc in Biology"1, or that he has an "MSc in dungeon physiology"2. And apparently "during his healing precision he was severely shabby"3.

I had no idea.

Judging by the torturous grammar and hilarious word choices, the bio seems to have been dragged through several iterations of Google Translate (or possibly just translated by my cat Google, which is an equally good explanation).

Google had a tough day on Sunday

I'm guessing that someone with less than stellar English then replaced every second or third word using a random selection from a thesaurus.

Now, we all know that science and spell checkers don't mix, but apparently scientific language forms an even more disastrous partnership with automated translation tools and/or careless thesaurus use. From disaster, however, springs hilarity: the cell/dungeon confusion was funny enough, but my absolute favourite part was the translation of "tissue culture" as "hankie enlightenment".

Genius.

As soon as I could stop laughing, I sent the link to several friends who also know the distiguished dungeon physiologist in question. One of them pointed out that the torturous translation process was no doubt intended to disguise the text's origin as a plagiarised Wikipedia entry.

Compare and contrast.

It truly is a privilege to see such outstanding scholarship in action!

-------------------- 

1) the many instances of "as good as" seem to be replacements for "as well as", "and", & "also"
2) "dungeon" = "cell"
3) apparently, "severely shabby" = "greatly influenced", as in by a particular mentor. I had to check this one against the original text.

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Cath has misheard that the bird is the word

A wonderful bird is the pelican,
His mouth can hold more than his belly can,
He can hold in his beak,
Enough food for a week.
I'm damned if I know how the hell he can!

(by Dixon Lanier Merritt, apparently. Not Ogden Nash. You learn something new every day!)

And I'm damned if I know how the hell I can have made the same ridiculous mistake twice.

It's all because of my habit of paying only partial attention to the TV. I'm usually doing something else at the same time - eating, talking, playing a game on my phone, reading a book, surfing the web, playing with a cat or two, that kind of thing. So some time last year, while I was "watching" the local news, I was startled to hear the anchor say that there'd been a pelican attack in one of Vancouver's eastern suburbs! By the time I'd looked up at the screen he'd moved on to another story, leaving me completely baffled and with some very odd mental images running through my brain.

Fortunately, the CBC website was running the same story - about a pellet gun attack.

Which made more sense.

Fast forward to last night, when Mr E Man and I were watching Survivor. I loooove Survivor (it's an extremely guilty pleasure), so I was actually watching it properly. However, during the commercial breaks I was paying attention to Saba, who was sprawled all over me and purring contentedly as I rubbed her belly. I was vaguely aware that there was some kind of cosmetics advert on the screen, but was suddenly snapped into full alertness by a rather bizarre slogan I'd just heard.

"The colour of pelicans???!!!", I blurted out before I could stop myself.

Mr E Man eventually managed to gasp out the word "elegance" in between fits of laughter.

Oops.

In my defense, it's still a ridiculous slogan. And later on in the show they actually showed some pelicans flying past the beach, which set us off laughing again. I suspect they'd already shown a similar shot before the commercial, which helped to trigger the confusion. Either that or I have a very bizarre subconscious.

Ooh! That just reminded me of something. Hang on a minute, Googling:

Ah, yes, I was right! 

To (mis)quote Douglas Adams in The Long Dark Teatime of the Soul:
It was a couple of days before Kate Schechter became aware of any of these things, or indeed of anything at all in the outside world.

She passed the time quietly in a world of her own in which she was surrounded as far as the eye could see with old cabin trunks full of past memories in which she rummaged with great curiosity, and sometimes bewilderment. Or, at least, about a tenth of the cabin trunks were full of vivid, and often painful or uncomfortable memories of her past life; the other nine-tenths were full of penguins pelicans, which surprised her. Insofar as she recognised at all that she was dreaming, she realised that she must be exploring her own subconscious mind. She had heard it said that humans are supposed only to use about a tenth of their brains, and that no one was very clear what the other nine-tenths were for, but she had certainly never heard it suggested that they were used for storing penguins pelicans.

So there you go. It's not my fault, it's just the way the human brain evolved.

Weirdly, like this post just did.

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Tuesday Pet Peeve: Careless North Americans

A certain phrase has been on my mental pet peeves list for a while. Every time I hear someone say it, it jars - it's not one of those UK*/North America differences where both ways are equally valid and I just have to get used to it, because the North American version is clearly just plain WRONG!

However, for some reason I've never felt quite strongly enough about this issue to blog about it (not on a Tuesday, anyway).

Last week, though, I was catching up on some (very) old podcasts and found that John Cleese has already said everything I wanted to say on the matter, much more eloquently than I ever could:



(ETA: Eva pointed out that David Mitchell has had a very similar rant on this subject



Love it!)

HA!

Now I have something to which I can refer people who challenge and/or mock me for saying "I couldn't care less". I will continue to say it this way because a) I'm still British, damnit and b) it's correct, whereas the North American way really doesn't make any sense (sorry).

A plague of dead parrots on people who carelessly say "I could care less" when they don't care at all!

---------------

*I say UK just because I'm not 100% sure which version is used in Australia, New Zealand, or Ireland, although I suspect they all say "I couldn't care less". 

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Friday Wednesday Quiz-ology

Yes folks, it's time for another fun quiz from my puzzle-a-day desk calendar!
 
I was going to save this for Friday, but I just submitted a grant after much stress and panic and lost sleep,* so I could do with a little light relief, even as I get stuck in to the next big project.

This time the actual puzzle on the calendar was to match the -ology to the subject under study. I got all 21 right (using a process of elimination in a few cases), so the quiz is clearly too easy in this original form. Because all my readers are also highly intelligent people (with excellent taste), I'm therefore going to just ask you to define every -ology, without giving you the matching list of subjects to choose from. (It should still be easy, as some of my readers ARE some of these kinds of -ologist).

As before, answer in the comments in any order you like - but please submit only one answer per person per hour, to give as many people as possible a chance to play!  

(AND NO GOOGLING!)

I'll update the post with the answers and bragging rights as and when I get time, and I'll add clues if there are any unanswered questions after a day or two.
  1. Agrology- Soil, as it relates to the growing of crops (Chall) - partial credit for Thomas Joseph, Antipodean, & Nat Blair
  2. Campanology - Bells (Stephen Curry)
  3. Cetology - Whales (Nat Blair)
  4. Cytology - Cells (ScientistMother)
  5. Dactylology - Sign language (Pika) - partial credit for Nico, Antipodean,
  6. Dendrology - Trees (Chall)
  7. Etiology - Causes / origins (Biochem Belle)
  8. Geomorphology - Tectonics / landforms (Scott) - partial credit (kinda) for Ruchi
  9. Lithology - Rocks / stones (Nat Blair)
  10. Meteorology - Weather (Biochem Belle)
  11. Metrology - Measurement (Schlupp)
  12. Mycology - Fungi (Ricardipus)
  13. Myology - Muscles (Nico (first to answer correctly) and Thomas Joseph (second, presumably independently!))
  14. Oology - Eggs (Nat Blair)
  15. Pomology - Fruit (Chall) - partial credit for Knutty Knitter
  16. Rhinology - Noses (Nat Blair)
  17. Selenology - Moon (Alyssa)
  18. Semiology - Signs (Lisbeth (first to answer correctly) and Pika (second, presumably independently!))
  19. Speleology - Caves (Chall) - partial credit for Ruchi
  20. Vexillology
  21. Vulcanology - Volcanoes (Erika Cule)

The person with the most correct answers at the end of the quiz will be declared Ologyologist in Chief.

----------------
*the Adobe Acrobat issues I blogged about in my last post turned out to be the least of my problems yesterday. The networked drive, which the IT guys tell every new hire to save all their files to because it gets backed up every hour and has all kinds of redundancies built in and has never, ever, failed even once in the 6.5 (non-contiguous) years I've worked here, went down with all the grant files on it at about 3pm yesterday. Oh, and the head of IT is on vacation. It came back up at 5:30, and I only lost about 25 minutes worth of edits made since the last back-up, but there was much wailing and gnashing of teeth. Oh, and the actual proposal had to be pasted into a text box on the online submission form, FFS, and wouldn't recognise the line breaks from the Word document until I double spaced them all and then deleted the extra spaces. I worked 12 hour days on Monday and Tuesday, and had to come in super early today to walk the Dean through the sign-off and submission procedure. But it is DONE!

After my experiences in my last job, though, I have to say that I much prefer to get stressed about things I actually care about, rather than product inserts and email campaigns. This is some seriously cool stuff, both scientifically and because it has the potential to significantly increase the speed and efficiency of the cancer drug development process. If I had to choose just one of the grants we've submitted this year to get funded I'd pick this one for sure, even though some of the other pending grants are for much more money. (Just don't tell the department's accountant I said that!)

Oh and yes, I do intend to drink some beers at Mr E Man's birthday dinner tonight!

Thursday, August 12, 2010

TMA: Too Many Acronyms

My Computer files and email inbox are awash, overflowing, drowning in the acronyms used by various funding agencies, academic institutes, media outlets, and assorted other organisations.

I'm sure many of my readers have the same issue. However, my problem is Compounded by working on (mainly) Breast Cancer in British Columbia, Canada - with American, British, and Canadian Collaborators. So the same letters tend to occur over and over:
  • A is for Agency, Alberta, Alliance, America, American, or Association
  • B is for Breast, British, or Broadcasting
  • C is for Canada, Canadian, Cancer, Center, Centre, Centres, Collaborative, Columbia, Consortium,  Corporation, or Council
  • F is for Foundation or Fund
  • I is for Innovation, Institute, or Institutes
  • N is for National or Network
  • S is for Science or Society

R is always for research and H is always for Health, for which I suppose I should be grateful.

Put any of these letters together in any Combination, and I probably have a matching folder somewhere.

Let's see, I have folders for the following: AACR, ACRI, BCCA, BCCRC, BCCF, CBC, CBCF, CBCRA, CCSRI, CFI, CIHR, CRUK, GBC, NCE, NCI, NCIC, NIH, NSERC, and OICR.

So today, Checking my Credit Card Balance online, I was Confused to see a payment to an entity Called BCF.

Very Confused.

Was there a new player in town? The British Columbia Foundation? The Breast Cancer Fund? The Broadcasting Centre Foundation? British Central Fund? Boring Christmas Food? Burgeoning Cat Fur? Big Chaotic Frenzy? Bring Cath Fudge?

And why the Bloody Cockeyed Fuck am I giving them money??!!

Until I realised the item was related to our upcoming trip to Vancouver Island.

A trip that necessitates paying a reservation fee to BC Ferries.

I think I need to get out more.

Friday, August 6, 2010

Friday Quiz: Scrambled Geometry

My sister-in-law got me a "puzzle of the day" desk calendar for Christmas. She apologised profusely for not getting me anything "better" (by which she meant "more expensive"), but honestly it's one of the best presents I got! Some of the puzzles are dumb, but lots of them are really fun, and just occasionally there's a science or maths themed entry that provides me with excellent blog fodder.

This one's a set of geometry-related anagrams, perfect for a Friday quiz for my readers!
  1. ALARM GALLOPER is PARALLELOGRAM (PIKA)
  2. BARLEY HOP is HYPERBOLA (BOB)
  3. EARTH RODENT is TETRAHEDRON (BOB)
  4. GREY TIN MOTOR is TRIGONOMETRY (ARINK)
  5. HOP DEARLY is POLYHEDRA (SILVER FOX)
  6. NUCLEAR DIPPER is PERPENDICULAR (PIKA)
  7. PRIME TREE is PERIMETER (PIKA)
  8. READ TIME is DIAMETER (ARINK)
  9. RELATE QUAIL is EQUILATERAL (ARINK)
  10. SEES COILS is ISOSCELES (BOB)
  11. TO SCRIBE is BISECTOR (PIKA)
  12. UPSET HONEY is HYPOTENUSE (BOB)
Answer in the comments - but please submit only one answer per person per hour, to give as many people as possible a chance to play before Bob attempts to sweep the board like he did last time. Oh, and there's no need to answer in the right order - choose any anagram you like!

I'll update the post with the answers and bragging rights as and when I get time, and I'll add clues if there are any unanswered questions after a day or two.

Have fun!

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Silly moi!

I have a talent for making born-and-bred Canadians laugh at me, especially when it comes to my accent and pronunciation. I mean, it's obviously just ridiculous to assume that French-looking names would be pronounced according to French pronunciation norms in a country where French is an official language!

This all started on my first visit to Vancouver Island, when I pronounced Esquimault, home of the Canadian Navy's Pacific fleet, as Eskimo. WRONG! It's Esk-WHY-molt.

Obviously.

There have been other examples over the years, with the most recent being new Vancouver Canucks defenceman Dan Hamhuis.

Which is apparently pronounced HAM-hoys*, not am-HWEE.

Now, in the Geordie dialect of the northeast of England, where I'm originally from, hoy means throw**. So when I hear "Ham-hoys", I imagine a Geordie sport that entails throwing pork joints as far as you can - similar to the Scottish caber toss.

But with ham.

This is gonna make next season's match commentary much more interesting.

---------------

*So I'm guessing his family isn't of French origin after all, then. It was the -uis that threw me!

**Apparently it's the same in Chinese! My Dad used to play on a football team in Manchester (which is not in Geordieland) that once tried out a goalie who'd recently immigrated from China. The goalie's kicks forward to his teammates were rather erratic, so they asked him to throw the ball to them instead - but he didn't understand. Everyone got really frustrated until my Dad shouted "just hoy it, man!" None of the other English players understood what he meant, but the goalie said "hoy? Oh, hoy!" and threw the ball straight to my Dad's feet.

Thursday, May 13, 2010

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Wren and Stumped-y

Damnit, Microsoft!


Why?

Just... why?

I mistype "were" all the freaking time. 

The title of this blog post is the first time I've deliberately typed "wren" in... years? decades? ever?

So why is it the first option on the suggestions list?! It's the least common (and alphabetically the last) word on there!

Booooooooo

/grumpy & crampy & keen to get outta here

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS SAINT PATTY'S DAY!

It's Paddy. The diminutive form of the name Patrick (or Pádraig in the original Irish form) is Paddy. Therefore it's Saint Paddy's day. Patty is a girl's name, the diminutive form of Patricia. Think Peppermint Patty. Kiss trust me, I'm (half) Irish.


I appreciate that the softening of the T sound in North American accents makes it difficult to distinguish from a D. I mean, even I ask for "warder" in restaurants now, as no-one ever understands me when I say "water" with a hard T. And one friend who thinks he's British but is actually Canadian says "bacon buddy" instead of "bacon butty", for the same reason - I have told him he's wrong, but old habits die hard.

But now you know, and you have no more excuses!

Anyway, I realise I'm fighting a losing battle here, so I guess you can call it whatever you like, as long as you call it a good reason to have a pint or ten! Have fun, and get home safe!



(Post scheduled for 12:01 am my time, to make sure I catch most of my readers before this happy day ends)

Monday, September 21, 2009

Britain's Got Talent Confusing Place Names

Do you ever find yourself cycling/walking/driving along, thinking of this and that or maybe just on autopilot, and then suddenly, for no apparent reason, chuckling over an incident or anecdote from years ago?

I did just that this morning. I have no idea why the memory popped into my head while I was cycling to work, but I suddenly thought of a story a friend told me about a train ride from Newcastle to Edinburgh. She'd started talking to an American couple who were visiting the UK for the first time, and was sharing her knowledge of the region through which they were passing. As the train came to a stop in the lovely seaside town of Berwick-upon-Tweed, the American guy asked, "so, what is there to do in Burr-wick-upon-Tweed?"

This made my friend smile, because contrary to what a foreigner would logically think, Berwick is actually pronounced Berrick. (Warwick is also pronounced Worrick, not War-wick). Being a helpful sort, she politely corrected him with "actually, the w is silent".

"OK then", he replied, "what is there to do in Burr-wick-upon-Teed?"

Now, before I get into other examples of British-town-names-that-North-Americans-pronounce-incorrectly, I'd like to pre-empt any accusations of anti-North-American sentiment by pointing out that I'm aware that this works both ways. When I first moved here, I (and every Brit of my acquaintaince who's visited or immigrated since) mispronounced Chilliwack as Chilly-wack, and Winnipeg as Winny-peg, several times. A kind and helpful Canadian eventually took the piss corrected me, and I've said both names properly (Chill-uh-wack and Winn-uh-peg) ever since.

So. Back to Britain. Leicester rhymes with Fester, and Gloucester rhymes with Foster. Glasgow rhymes with Go, not Cow, and the nearby town of Milngavie is pronounced Mull-guy, but no-one ever gets that one right the first time (and I'm not even touching Wales). Also, county names that end in -shire should sound like -shuh, not -shy-er. (York-shuh, Lester-shuh and so on). -by on the end of a name (e.g. the town of Haxby, where I grew up) signifies a -be sound, not a -buy sound (Hax-be). And -ham on the end of a name should be pronounced -um, not -ham (so it's Old-um, not Old-ham, and Birming-um, not Birming-ham). So far, so good.

It's the -burghs, -boroughs, and -broughs that really trip people up though. You see, they're all pronounced the same way. Yup, Edinburgh, Peterborough, and Middlesbrough all end with the same sound - Edin-bruh, Peter-bruh, Middles-bruh.

No, really, they do.

But the best mispronunciation story ever was told to me by a friend who went to university in the Midlands. He was once asked for directions by a car full of Aussies - and could barely stop laughing for long enough to tell them how to get to Loughborough.

Which is pronounced Luff-bruh.

Not Looga-berooga.

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Data Ducks?

Here's a gem from the Microsoft Word Thesaurus:


No, I didn't accidentally insert a space there; I actually clicked a link from the entry for "data". And this was all that popped up.

I'm sure there's a joke in there somewhere. Maybe about getting your ducks in a row before using a thesaurus.

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Tuesday pet peeve: tired of weary

Yes, it's another pedantic pet peeve!

I hear more and more people saying they're "weary" of something when what they mean is that they're cautious, suspicious, or distrustful of it.

You're looking for "wary", or maybe "leery". "Weary" means tired. If you say you're "weary of" something, it means you're bored or dissatisfied with it.

Go on. Look it up. Any dictionary will do.

See?

A plague of insomnia upon people who misuse the word "weary"!

p.s. it's my second wedding anniversary today! I can hardly believe it. I am definitely not weary (or wary, or leery) of Mr E Man.

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Tuesday pet peeve

I don't know why everyone's so negative about Mondays. I like Mondays. I come in all fresh and well rested, chat to various colleagues about their weekends, and settle into work full of enthusiasm and motivation. I spend my lunch break stocking up on milk, fruit, and other supplies to get me through the rest of the week, and have a very productive day.

(Mostly).

Wednesdays are hump days, which is nice. On Thursdays the weekend is in sight, with a pay cheque every second week, and then Fridays are usually the most relaxed day of the week, with coffee dates and longer lunches.

It's the Tuesdays that get me.

Tuesdays are busy but generally unproductive days, with endless meetings and emails and additions to my to-do list. I'm no longer quite so fresh and enthusiastic, tend to get bogged down in admin and crisis-of-the-week issues, and the weekend is still days away.

So it's a good day to start what may or may not become a recurring series of Tuesday posts.

Today's Pet Peeve:

"Regular" does not mean "Frequent".

How often do you see a questionnaire with options labelled "Never, Occasionally, Regularly, Always"?

"Regular" means that an event occurs at, well, regular, predictable intervals. That can mean once an hour, once a day, once a year, once a century, or once a millenium. It does not tell you anything at all about the frequency of the event.

A plague of constipation upon people who misuse the word "regular".

Thursday, February 19, 2009

Read this headline

(This one)

and see if you agree that using a different word would have avoided a rather unfortunate word juxtaposition.

Yeah... at first glance, I was thinking more "OMG, carnage in the neonate unit" than "nice good-news story".

--------------
Update, Feb 25th: the federal government just legislated more protection for these killers murderers orcs beautiful endangered animals.